22-01-2009, 09:38 AM
TheEd Wrote:Hi and welcome Big Swede
Thanks!

TheEd Wrote:some of your PB's look a little suspect, particularly the 5k in comparison to the 10k time.
If you have indeed run sub 20 minutes on an accurate course then I do believe there is a lot of scope for you.
sub 4 minutes per km is a good marker and especially in relation to age
impressive time for 92 kg, I might add
The 5k time was done in perfect conditions on a 400m track whith the help of a friend that held the pace for me. It was a real strugle but the mind did beat the body this time! Nobody expected me to do sub20.
The 10k time is actually 10,05k and was hilly(?) highwaycourse. I think my weight might be more of a burden on the longer races, therefore my PB̫̉s look suspect. But i belive that i can do 42 something on 10k today.
TheEd Wrote:what sport did you do previously to taking up running?
I havent been doing any sports since I was 19 years old. Just some random tennisgame now and then.
TheEd Wrote:You mention this
"It feels like I have improved the Anaerobe threshold to 160-161 since the test."
on first look at your data I thought that your threshold was a little low and it can indeed be trained up and with weight loss everything will certainly improve
is 92kg your current weight or have you got some Xmas extra?
The last year my weight has been around 90kg so right now its a little christmas extra. It was 105kg when I started running in 2006 and I'm still struggling to lose the last 10kg.
TheEd Wrote:On reading your data, it is highly motivating for me to get started again, thanks for this inspiration
Your welcome!
TheEd Wrote:Where do you plan on doing your time-trial, on a treadmill, I suspect Gothenburg must have icy roads and the track may be slippery?
As the weather looks right now Ỉ̫ll do it on a track.
TheEd Wrote:Let's see how the trial goes and we can configure the sessions accordingly
Thanks
TheEd
Thanks for your reply!
Big Swede